• Users Online: 131
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
STUDENT CORNER
Year : 2017  |  Volume : 3  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 68-72

Predictive validity of derived clinical adiposity parameters in the assessment of type 2 diabetes mellitus among adults


1 MBBS Student, Department of Community Medicine, ESIC Medical College & PGIMSR, Chennai, India
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Community Medicine, ESIC Medical College & PGIMSR, Chennai, India

Correspondence Address:
Swetha Kumar
MBBS student, ESIC Medical College & PGIMSR,KK Nagar, Chennai 600078, Tamil Nadu
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/2395-2113.251896

Rights and Permissions

Background: Body Mass Index (BMI) is a standard universal method of assessing clinical adiposity risk. Several studies have shown that obesity as defined by BMI criteria is a risk factor for type 2 diabetes. However, among Asian Indians there is an increasing incidence of thin-fat phenotype where BMI fails as a clinical risk predictor for diabetes. So, there is a need for alternate clinical adiposity parameters. Objective: To assess the predictive validity of derived clinical adiposity parameters in the assessment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus among adults attending a tertiary hospital. Methods: A cross-sectional comparative study was performed in which 100 diabetic adult men and women attending the diabetic Out Patient Department were enrolled. As a comparison group, 53 non-diabetic adults attending the OPD and other non-diabetic relatives of patients were enrolled. Anthropometric measurements such as height, weight, waist and hip circumference were measured and derived adiposity parameters such as Body Mass Index, Waist-Hip Ratio, Waist-Height Ratio, Body Adiposity Index and Conicity Index were calculated. Receiver Operating Characteristic curves was plotted for each adiposity parameter with diabetes status as a dependent variable to assess predictive validity of the adiposity parameters in assessing diabetes risk. Age and gender-segregated analysis were also performed. Results: Waist-Hip ratio cut-off=1.009 (AUC=0.956; 95%CI 0.927-9-0.985) sensitivity=90%, specificity=81.1% had the best predictive ability for diabetes. Body adiposity index cut-off=30.5285; (AUC=0.568 95%CI 0.470-0.665) sensitivity=52%, specificity=50.9% was the least predictive. Waist-Height Ratio cut-off=0.5889 (AUC=0.708; 95%CI 0.624-0.792) sensitivity=62%, specificity=62.3% and Conicity Index cut-off=1.5393 (AUC= 0.692; 95% CI 0.603- 0.781) sensitivity=61%, specificity=60.4% had moderate predictive ability and finally Body Mass Index (BMI) cutoff= 26.25 (AUC=0.585; 95% CI 0.491-0.679) sensitivity=56%, specificity=54.7% had a poor predictive ability. Gender segregated analysis showed that BMI and Body Adiposity Index were poor predictors of diabetes in women. Conclusion: Waist-Hip Ratio has the best predictive validity in the assessment of risk of type 2 diabetes. This must be confirmed using longitudinal studies.


[PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed389    
    Printed47    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded62    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal